So you want to answer the phone call for Papers? It offers strategies for the information and presentation regarding the abstract, as well as samples of the very best abstracts submitted to your 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.
Typically, an abstract describes the topic you want to present at the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution into the literature that is historical. It is almost always limited to 250-500 words. The word limit could be challenging: some graduate students usually do not fret within the short limit and hastily write and submit an abstract in the last minute, which frequently hurts their chances of being accepted; other students attempt to condense the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, and that can be equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are those most often invited to provide their research. If you are intimidated by the project, don’t be – the abstract is a form that is fairly standardized of. Follow the guidelines that are basic and avoid common pitfalls and you will greatly enhance your abstract.
Diligently follow all style that is abstract formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify word or page length, and maybe some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, how exactly to present quotes, simple tips to present authors and works, whether or not to include footnotes or not. Make sure that you strictly stick to all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP does not provide style that is abstract formatting guidelines, it is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read a lot of these things and don’t look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Make certain you orient your abstract topic to deal with any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.
With a 250-500 word limit, write only what is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and focus on excessive prepositional phrasing.
Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A good abstract will address the next questions: What is the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What is your thesis/argument? It ought to be original. What is your evidence? State forthrightly that you are using source material that is primary. So how exactly does your paper fit into the historiography? What’s happening in the area of study and just how does your paper contribute to it? Why does it matter? We know this issue is essential for your requirements, why should it be crucial that you the abstract selection committee?
You ought to be as specific as possible, avoiding overly broad or statements that are overreaching claims. And that is it: don’t get sidetracked by writing narrative that is too much over explaining. Say what you need to say and absolutely nothing more.
Maintain your audience at heart. How background that is much give on a subject is determined by the conference. May be the conference a general humanities conference, a graduate that is general history conference, or something like that more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch should always be worthy of the specificity of the conference: the more specific this issue, the less background that is broad need to give and vice versa.
Revise and edit your abstract to ensure its final presentation is error free. The editing phase can also be the time that is best to visit your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The final draft should be linear and clear and it also should read smoothly. If you’re tripping over something while reading, the selection that is abstract will as well. Ask another graduate student to read your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.
Your language must certanly be professional as well as your style should stay glued to academic standards. Contractions may be appealing because of the expressed word limits, however they should be avoided. If essaywritersite.com reddit citation guidelines are not specifically given, it really is appropriate to use the author’s name and title of work (in either italics or quotation marks) in the text rather than use footnotes or in-text citations.
While one question, if really good, can be posed in your abstract, you ought to avoid writing more than one (maybe two, if really really good). Should you pose a concern or two, be sure that you either answer it or address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you’re posing an evident rhetorical question, you should never just let a question hang there. Too many questions takes up way too much space and leaves less room so that you could develop your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. quite often, posing too many questions leaves the abstract committee wondering if you are planning to handle one or all in your paper if you even know the answers in their mind. Remember, you’re not anticipated to have previously written your conference paper, but you are anticipated to own done enough research that you can adequately cover in 15-20 minutes that you are prepared to write about a specific topic. Illustrate that you have done so.
Language that helps you be as specific as you are able to in presenting your argument is great but don’t get the readers bogged down in jargon. They will be reading a lot of abstracts and won’t wish to wade through the language that is unnecessary. Ensure that it it is simple.
When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize they are performing this. Sometimes this happens because students are not yet clear on their argument. Contemplate it some more and then write. Other times, students write carelessly plus don’t proofread. Be sure each sentence is exclusive and therefore it contributes to the flow of one’s abstract.
The committee that is abstract not need to be reminded of the grand sweep of history to be able to contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically inside the historiography.
The samples below represent the five scoring samples that are highest submitted into the selection committee for the ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two associated with the samples below were subsequently selected for publication within the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented at the graduate student history conference are suitable for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a review that is peer before publication.